Abstract:
This article is a critique of the research perspective that analyzes political myths based on the methods of the study of myths. The author points to the need to supplement this perspective with the Lacanian theory of fantasy, which allows for capture of subjective desire manifested in myths. Theories in the study of myths (of Lévi-Strauss and Barthes) conceptualize myth as an attempt to overcome the original antinomy of human experience by constructing a space of ahistorical meaning deprived of contradictions. Based on the analysis of classic study of myths texts and Marcin Napiórkowski’s work, the author points to a paradox within the methods of the study of myths: while it describes myth as a tool for getting rid of historical contradictions, it creates ahistorical, and therefore, mythologized, interpretative categories. Supplementing this method with the Lacanian theory of fantasy allows us to overcome this paradox by pointing to historicized interpretation of desire that is manifested in myths.
Keywords:
study of myths, psychoanalysis, fantasy, political myth, Jacques Lacan, political discourse
How to cite:
Barysz, Barbara. “Between Myth and Fantasy: On the Application of Psychoanalytic Tools to the Analysis of Political Discourse.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 3 (2025): 157-181. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0028.
Author:
Barbara Barysz
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
72 Nowy Świat Street, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1966-9914
barbara.barysz@ifispan.edu.pl
References:
Armstrong, Karen. A Short Story of Myth. Canongate Books, 2008.
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Anette Lavers. The Noonday Press, 1991.
Burzyk, Mateusz. “Psychoanaliza a polityka: stawka podmiotu.” Diametros, no. 35 (2013): 1-20.
Fink, Bruce. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400885671.
Fink, Bruce. The Lacanian Subject. Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press, 1995.
Freud, Sigmund. “Mourning and Melancholia.” In Vol. 14 of The Standard Edition of The Complete Psychological Works. Translated and edited by James Strachey. The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1957.
Kowalska, Małgorzata. Dialektyka poza dialektyką. Od Bataille’a do Derridy. Aletheia, 2000.
Lacan, Jacques. “The Neurotic’s Individual Myth.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, no. 48 (1979): 405-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1979.11926884.
Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire, Livre II. Seuil, 1973.
Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre VIII. Le transfert (1960-61). Seuil, 1991.
Lacan, Jacques. “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious.” In Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by Bruce Fink. Norton & Company, 2007.
Leder, Andrzej. Prześniona rewolucja. Ćwiczenie z logiki historycznej. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, 2014.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. “The Structural Study of Myth.” The Journal of American Folklore 68, no. 270 (1955): 428-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/536768.
Mieletynski, Jelizar. “Claude Lévi-Strauss: czy tylko etnologia?.” Pamiętnik Literacki: czasopismo kwartalne poświęcone historii i krytyce literatury polskiej 64, no. 1 (1973): 325-45. BazHum.
Napiórkowski, Marcin. Powstanie umarłych. Historia pamięci 1944-2014. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, 2016.
Žižek, Slavoj. Lacan. Przewodnik Krytyki Politycznej. Translated by Julian Kutyła. Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, 2008.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Plague of Fantasies. Verso, 2008.
Žižek, Slavoj. Tarrying with the Negative. Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Duke University Press,1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hphn6.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.