Abstract:
The article discusses satisfaction with self-presentation as the way of functioning (modus vivendi) of a magnanimous man in relation to Aristotelian ethics. Even though self-presentation is usually considered as a kind of biologically determined instinct, it may be argued that self-presentation is also an aspect of the actions of a magnanimous man. Naturalist social theories concerning moral norms are rooted in nineteenth and twentieth century psychologism, which claims that the starting point for reflection on the nature of social morality are the psychical characteristics of individuals. One example of psychologism is the concept of Sorokin who compares two basic mentalities determining culture: sensate and ideational. On the other hand, there are theories in the current of normative naturalism which postulate a reduction of ethical values to certain biological – mostly psychological – properties or states. This current includes Portmann’s theory referring to the instinct of self-presentation discussed in this article. Portman’s reflections are confirmed by the cultural concept of homo ludens proposed by Huizinga. Self-presentation may be considered not only as a biologically determined instinct on the grounds of normative naturalism, but also on the grounds of realist ethics as a value in itself, non-reducible to any particular biological facts. It is in the perspective of Aristotle’s ethics of virtue that self-presentation becomes an expression of the actions of a magnanimous man correlated with ethical value, as it recognizes satisfaction with self-presentation as a state that depends on the success of human activity. This explains why it is satisfaction, or pleasure, or happiness that can be reasonably regarded as the goal of human life. Satisfaction is an emotion that accompanies the achievement of perfection in various forms of human activity. However, satisfaction, pleasure, or happiness are not, in this context, a criterion that determines our behavior, for satisfaction alone is not a reason to perform a particular type of activity. What one finds satisfaction in depends primarily on the virtues one possesses. This is why self-presentation becomes an ethical value only in the case of a magnanimous man, one of an ideational mentality; in the case of a proud man, one of a sensate mentality, self-presentation proves to be an anti-value. An embodiment of this latter attitude in modern liberal democracy is Ortega y Gasset’s arrogant mass-man, as well as the mass-man engulfed in apathy described by Sloterdijk.
Keywords:
Aristotelian ethics, mass-man, magnanimous man, normative naturalism, self-presentation
How to cite:
Drabarek, Anna. “Self-Presentation as the Modus Vivendi of a Magnanimous Man.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 1 (2025): 134-158. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0008.
Author:
Anna Drabarek
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology. The Maria Grzegorzewska University
Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353 Warsaw, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-9643
adrabarek@aps.edu.pl
References:
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33, no. 124 (1958): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943.
Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by William David Ross. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
Aristotle. Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 1999.
Aristotle. Rhetorics. Translated by Lane Cooper. New York, London: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1932.
Barnouw, Dagmar. “Anthropologische Phantasie: Canetti und Freud zum Phänomen der Masse.” In Canettis Masse und Macht oder die Aufgabe des gegenwärtigen Denkens. Vienna: John Pattillo-Hess, 1988.
Canetti, Elias. Crowds and Power. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984.
Firth, Raymond. “An Appraisal of Modern Social Anthropology.” Annual Reviews 4, (October 1975): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.000245.
Freyer, Hans. Theorie des gegenwartigen Zeitalters. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags Anstalt, 1955.
Hursthouse, Rosalind, On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York 1999.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955.
Kardiner, Abram, and Edward Preble. They Studied Man. New York: The New American Library, 1963.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
Malinowski, Bronisław. Kultura jako wyznacznik zachowania się. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/ea7c4926-e909-4250-9d55-a00230f75b51/content.
Malinowski, Bronisław. Sex and Repression in Savage Society. London, New York: Routledge, 2002.
Malinowski, Bronisław. “O zasadzie ekonomii myślenia.” In vol. 1 of Dzieła. Warsaw: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1987.
Ortega y Gasset, José. The Revolt of the Masses. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1957.
Ossowska, Maria. Ethos rycerski i jego odmiany. Warsaw: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1986.
Portmann, Adolf. Biologische Fragmente zu einer Lehre vom Menschen. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co., 1944.
Portmann, Adolf. Das Tier als sociales Wesen. Zurich: Rhein-Verlag, 1953.
Rudebusch, George. “Pleasure.” In A Companion to Aristotle. Edited by Georgios Anagnostopoulos. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305661.ch25.
Sloterdijk, Peter. Die Verachtung der Massen. Versuch über Kulturkämpfe in der modernen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2000.
Smolak, Maciej. “Dobro, przyjemność, a typy przyjaźni w wykładni Arystotelesa (EEVII2).” Peitho/Examina Antiqua 7, no. 1 (2016): 183-204. https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2016.1.9.
Sorokin, Pitirim. Contemporary Sociological Theories through the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1964.
Sorokin, Pitirim. Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law, and Social Relationships. London, New York: Routledge, 1985.
Stover, James, and Ronald Polansky. “Moral Virtue and Megalopsychia.” Ancient Philosophy 23, no. 2 (Fall 2003): 351-59. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200323231.
Szutta, Natasza. “Moral Education from the Perspective of Virtue Ethics.” Diametros, no. 46 (2015): 111-33.
Theophrastus. Characters. Book VI of The Reckless Man, translated by Richard C. Jebb. N.p., 1870. https://www.eudaemonist.com/biblion/characters/.
Tolone, Oreste. “Adolf Portmann the Expressive Function of Technique.” Ethics & Politics 14, no. 1 (2012): 230-43.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.