A Subaltern Pain: The Problem of Violence in Philosophy’s Pain Discourse


The scientific and philosophical approach to pain must be supplemented by a hermeneutics studying how racism has complicated the communication of pain. Such an investigation reveals that not only are non-white people seen as credibly speaking their pain, but also pain “science” is one of the ways races have historically been constructed. I illustrate this through a study of Frantz Fanon’s clinical writings, along with eighteenth- and nineteenth-century slave-owners’ medical manuals and related documents. I suggest that, with this history, what philosophers understand as the problem of pain is best framed as the problem of colonial violence.


IASP definition of pain, Frantz Fanon, subaltern, philosophy of mind, racism

How to cite:

Harfouch, John. “A Subaltern Pain: The Problem of Violence in Philosophy’s Pain Discourse.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3, no. 3(9) (2019): 127-144. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0034.


John Harfouch
Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama-Huntsville
301 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA


Anand K.S.J. and Kenneth D. Craig. “New Perspectives on the Definition of Pain.” Pain 67 (1996): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(96)03198-3.

Anonymous. Practical Rules for the Management and Medical Treatment of Negro Slaves in the Sugar Colonies. London: Printed by J. Barfield, 1803.

Aydede, Murat. “Defending the IASP Definition of Pain.” The Monist 100 (2017): 439-464. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5211.001.0001.

Aydede, Murat. “Introduction: A Critical and Quasi-Historical Essay on Theories of Pain.” In Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study, edited by Murat Aydede, 1-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.

Berry, Dana Ramey. The Price for Their Pound of Flesh: The Value of the Enslaved, from Womb to Grave, in the Building of a Nation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2017.

Bertrand, Louis. The Art of Suffering. Translated by E.F. Peeler. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1936.

Bigelow, H. J. Surgical Anaesthesia: Addresses and Other Papers. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1894.

Bonica, JJ. “The Need for a Taxonomy.” Pain 6 (1979): 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(79)90046-0.

Bonnet, Charles. Contemplation de la nature. Volume 1. Hamburg: J.G. Virchaux, 1782.

Bonnet, Charles. La paligénésie philosophique. Volume 1. Geneva: Claude Philibert and Berthelemi Chirol, 1769.

Boulbina, Seloua Luste. Les Arabes Peuvent-ils Parler? Paris: Blackjack, 2011.

Bourke, Joanna. “Pain Sensitivity: An Unnatural History from 1800 to 1965.” The Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (2014): 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-014-9283-7.

Brewster, David. The Edinburgh Encyclopedia. Philadelphia: Published by Joseph and Edward Parker, 1832.

Cartwright, Samuel. “Report on the Diseases and Physical Peculiarities of the Negro Race.” Medicine and Surgical Journal (1851): 691-715.

Coghill, Robert. “Pain: Making the Private Experience Public.” In Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study, edited by Murat Aydede, 299-306. Boston: MIT Press, 2005.

Craig, Kenneth D. “Assessment of Credibility.” In The Encyclopedia of Pain, edited by R.F. Schmidt and W.D. Willis, 491-493. New York: Springer Publishing, 2006.

Craig, Kenneth D. et al. “Emergent Pain Language and Communication Competence in Infants and Children.” Presses Universitaires de France 8 (2006): 52-71. https://doi.org/10.3917/enf.581.0052.

Craig, Kenneth D. “The Social Communication Model of Pain.” Canadian Psychology 50 (2009): 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014772.

Cunniningham, Nance. “Inclusion of the Nonverbal Patient: A Matter of Moral Emergency.” Pain Forum 8 (1999): 110-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1082-3174(99)70052-8.

Do Carmo Leal, Maria, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama, Ana Paula Esteves Pereira, Vanessa Eufrauzino Pacheco, Cleber Nascimento do Carmo, Ricardo Ventura Santos, “The Color of Pain: Racial Iniquities in Prenatal Care and Childbirth in Brazil.” Cadernos de Saude Publica (2017).

Duncan, Grant. “The Meanings of ‘Pain’ in Historical, Social, and Political Context.” The Monist 100 (2017): 514-531. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx026.

Fanon, Frantz. A Dying Colonialism. Translated by Haakon Chevalier. New York: Grove Press, 1965.

Fanon, Frantz. “Considérations Ethnopsychiatriques.” In Écrits sur l’aliénation et la liberté, edited by Jean Khalfa and Robert J.C. Young, 422-425. Paris: La Découverte, 2018.

Fanon, Frantz. Oeuvres. Paris: La Découverte, 2011.

Fanon, Frantz. Toward the African Revolution. Translated by Haakon Chevalier. New York: Grove Press, 1967.

Green, Marcus. “Gramsci Cannot Speak: Presentations and Interpretations of Gramsci’s Concept of the Subaltern.” Rethinking Marxism 14 (2002): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242242.

Gustafson, Donald. “Categorizing Pain.” In Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study, ed. Murat Aydede, 219-241. Boston: MIT Press. 2005.

Hall, Richard. W., and Kanwaljeet J. S. Anand. “Pain Management in Newborns.” Clinics in Perinatology 4 (2014): 895-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.010.

Herr, Keala, P.J. Coyne,  Margo McCaffery, Renee Manworren, and S. Merkel. “Pain Assessment in the Patient Unable to Self-Report: Position Statement with Clinical Practice Recommendations.” Pain Management Nursing (December 2011): 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.002.

Hill, Christopher S. “Ow! The Paradox of Pain.” In Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study, ed. Murat Aydede, 75-98. Boston: MIT Press. 2005.

Hoffman, Kelly M., Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axt, and M. Norman Oliver. “Racial Biases in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs about Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites.” PNAS 113 (2016): 4296-4301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113.

Hogarth, Rana. Medicalizing Blackness: Making Racial Difference in the Atlantic World: 1780-1840. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2017.

Horne, Alistair. A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954-1962. New York: NYRB Classics, 2006.

International Association for the Study of Pain. “Nocioception.” ISAP Terminology. Last modified December 14, 2017. https://www.iasp pain.org/terminology?navItemNumber=576#Nociception.

Izzidien, Ruqaya. “Prevent is the Virus, Not the Vaccine.” The New Arab, June 15, 2018. https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/comment/2018/6/15/prevent-is-the-virus-not-the-vaccine.

Jones, Thomas Wharton. “Note on the Rete Mucosum of the Skin; With a Theory of Albinism.” The Lancet 20 (1833): 523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)94844-0.

Kant, Immanuel. “Determination of the Concept of a Human Race.” In Kant and the Concept of Race. Edited by Jon M. Mikkelsen, 125-142. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2013.

Katz, Joel, and Ronald Melzack. “Measurement of Pain.” Surgical Clinics of North America 79 (1999): 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70381-9.

Leriche, Rene. The Surgery of Pain. Translated by Archibald Young. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1939.

Macey, David. Frantz Fanon: A Biography. London: Verso, 2012.

Marriott, David. Whither Fanon? Studies in the Blackness of Being. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2018.

McCormick, J.N. Pain and Sympathy. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1907.

Melzack, Ronald, and Patrick D. Wall. “Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory.” Science 150 (1965): 971-79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971.

Merskey, Harold. “Logic, Truth, and Language in Concepts of Pain.” Supplement 1, Quality of Life Research 3 (1994): S69-S76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433379.

Nahmias, Eddy. “The Problem of Pain.” In Pain: New Essays on Its Nature and the Methodology of Its Study, ed. Murat Aydede, 307-314. Boston: MIT Press, 2005.

Park, Peter K.J. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780-1830. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2013.

Pernick, Martin. A Calculus of Suffering: Pain, Professionalism, and Anesthesia in Nineteenth Century America. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.

Porot, Antoine. “Notes de Psychiatrie Musulmane.” Annales medico-psychologiques 9 (1918): 377-384.

Porot, Antoine. and D.C. Arrii. “L’Impulsivite Criminelle Chez L’Indigène Algérien – Ses Facteurs.” Annales medico-psychologiques 2 (1932): 632-864.

Rey, Rosalyn. The History of Pain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pres, 1995.

Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.

Spivak, Gayatri. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflections on the History of an Idea, ed. Rosalind C. Morris, 21-80. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.

Spivak, Gayatri. “In Response: Looking Back, Looking Forward.” In Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflections on the History of an Idea, edited by Rosalind C. Morris, 237-292. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.

Spivak, Gayatri. “Marginality in the Teaching Machine.” In Outside in the Teaching Machine, 58-85. New York: Routledge, 2009.

Temple, Beverley. “Pain in People with Developmental Disabilities: A Scoping Review.” Journal on Developmental Disabilities 18 (2012): 73-86.

Tidyman, Philip. “A Sketch of the Most Remarkable Diseases of the Negroes of the Southern States.” Philadelphia Journal of the Medical and Physical Sciences (1826): 306-338.

Wall, Patrick. Pain: The Science of Suffering. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.

Werner, Anne, and Kirsti Malterud . “It is Hard Work Behaving as a Credible Patient: Encounters Between Women with Chronic Pain and their Doctors.” Social Science and Medicine 57 (2003): 1409-1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00520-8.

White, Charles. An Account of the Regular Gradation of Man. London: Printed for C. Dilly in the Poultry, 1799.

Wilson, Yolonda, Amina White, Akilah Jefferson, and Marion Danis. “Intersectionality in Clinical Medicine: The Need for a Conceptual Framework.” The American Journal of Bioethics 19, no. 2 (1990): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1557275.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.