2026-01Thematic Section
Against Mimesis: On the Loss of Narrativity in Present Tense Narration

Abstract:

The main argument of this article is that narrative, as a verbal manifestation of some iconic aspects of human experience relating to temporality and memory, among others, can only lose its lucidity and even its recognized psychological function of structuring reality, when rendered in the anti-mimetic mode of using the present tense in the entirety of a written text. On phenomenological grounds it is argued that there is a continuity between how human beings experience time and how it is represented in narrative form. Using the conceptual apparatus of classical narratology and linguistics, it is also shown that a normative understanding of narrative requires the use of the past tense as a default. Some examples of contemporary fiction written in a continuous present tense are used to demonstrate the validity of some of the theoretical considerations underlying the main argument.

Keywords:

memory, narrative, narrativity, present-tense narration, temporality

How to cite:

Popova, Yanna. “Against Mimesis: On the Loss of Narrativity in Present Tense Narration.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 10, no. 1 (2026): 46-65. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2026.0003.

Author:

Yanna Popova
Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Christian Philosophy,
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5218-5595
y.popova@uksw.edu.pl

References:

Avanessian, Armen, and Anke Henning. Present Tense: A Poetics. Bloomsbury, 2015.

Basseler, Michael, and Dorothee Birke. “Mimesis of Remembering.” Journal of Literary Theory 16, no. 2 (2022): 213-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2022-2023.

Carr, David. “Discussion. Ricoeur on Narrative.” In On Paul Ricoeur. Narrative and Interpretation. Edited by David Wood. Routledge, 1991.

Carr, David. Time, Narrative, and History. Indiana University Press, 1986.

Chafe, Wallace L. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Chafe, Wallace L. “A Linguist’s Perspective on William James and ‘The Stream of Thought.’” Consciousness and Cognition 9, no. 4 (2000): 618-28. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0490.

Comrie, Bernard. Tense. Cambridge University Press, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815.

Doerr, Anthony. All the Light We Cannot See. 4th Estate, 2014.

Doerr, Anthony. Cloud Cuckoo Land. Scribner, 2021.

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. Collins Classics, 2020.

Fleischman, Suzanne. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Routledge, 1990.

Fludernik, Monika. “Chronology, Time, Tense and Experientiality in Narrative.” Language and Literature 12, no. 2 (2003): 117-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947003012002295.

Fludernik, Monika. “Narratology and Literary Linguistics.” In Oxford Textbook of Tense and Aspect. Edited by Robert I. Binnick. Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0002.

Fludernik, Monika. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. Routledge, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97.

Gebauer, Carolin. Making Time: World Construction in the Present-Tense Novel. De Gruyter, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110708134.

Huber, Irmtraud. Present-Tense Narration in Contemporary Fiction. Palgrave, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56213-5.

Husserl, Edmund. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness. Indiana University Press, 1964.

James, William. The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt, 1890. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000.

Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. Oxford University Press, 1967.

Kucała, Bożena. Of What is Passing: Present-Tense Narration in the Contemporary Historical Novel. Jagiellonian University Press, 2023.

Labov, William. “Narrative Pre-Construction.” Narrative Inquiry 16, no. 1 (2006): 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.07lab.

Mantel, Hilary. Wolf Hall. 4th Estate, 2010.

Ondaatje, Michael. The English Patient. Bloomsbury, 1992.

Popova, Yanna. Stories, Meaning, and Experience: Narrativity and Enaction. Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880488.

Popova, Yanna. “Narrativity.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. Edited by Violetta Sotirova. Bloomsbury, 2015.

Popova, Yanna, and Elena Cuffari. “Temporality of Sense-Making in Narrative Interactions.” Cognitive Semiotics 11, no. 1 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0007.

Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, 1984.

Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, 1985.

Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Rimmon-Kenan, Schlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. Routledge, 2005.

Rumelhart, David. “Notes on a Schema for Stories.” In Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. Edited by David Bobrow and Alan Collins. Academic Press, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6.

Schank, Robert C., and Paul R. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.

Stanzel, Franz K. A Theory of Narrative. Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Tulving, Edel. Elements of Episodic Memory. Clarendon Press, 1983.

Tulving, Edel. “Episodic Memory and Autonoesis: Uniquely Human?” In The Missing Link in Cognition: Origins of Self-Reflective Consciousness. Edited by Herbert S. Terrace and Janet Metcalf. Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0001.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.