The main theme of this essay is f i n i t e l i f e, which is the bedrock of modern biopolitics. In the series of lectures devoted to the ‘birth of biopolitics,’ Michel Foucault defines it as a new system of ‘governing the living’ based on the natural cycle of birth and death, and the law of genesis kai phtora, ‘becoming and perishing.’ Foucault’s answer to modern biopolitics is to accept its basic premise – that life is finite, and, consequently, reduced to the natural law of birth and death – and then slightly correct the naive liberal trust in the ‘naturalness’ of human existence by appropriating and internalizing the true essence of the biopolitical paradigm: the disciplining practices. This essay contests Foucault’s minimalist Neostoic program of the ‘care of the self’ by demonstrating that we can still hope for a n o t h e r f i n i t u d e that refrains from any renaturalization of human existence.
human difference, biopolitics, philosophical anthropology, psychoanalysis
How to cite:
Bielik-Robson, Agata. “The Human Difference: Beyond Nomotropism.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 1, no. 1 (2017): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.26319/EIDOS-001-HUMAN-DIFFERENCE.
Theology & Religious Studies, University of Nottingham
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Science
Aurelius, Marcus. Meditations. Translated by G. M. A Grube. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill, 1963.
Foucault, Michel. “La vie: l’expérience et le science.” In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.
Foucault, Michel. “Le souci de la verité. Entretien avec F. Ewald.” In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.
Foucault, Michel. Care of the Self. The History of Sexuality III. Translated by Robert Hurley. London: Penguin, 1986..
Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France 1978–79. ed. Michel; Senellart, trans. Graham Burchell, (Houndmills and New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2008),
Hadot, Pierre. The Veil of Isis. An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Translated by Michael Chase. The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass, 2006.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, Translated by A. V. Miller. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969.
Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. Yale University Press: New Haven, 2000.
Lacan, Jacques. “Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectics of Desire.” In Écrits. A Selection, Translated by Alan Sheridan, London: Routledge, 1989..
Laplanche, Jean. Entre séduction et inspiration: l’homme. Paris: Quadrige / Presses Universitaires de France, 1999.
Santner, Eric L. “Freud’s “Moses” and the Ethics of Nomotropic Desire.” October 88 (1999): 3-41.
Sloterdijk, Peter. Regeln für den Menschenpark. Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über Humanismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Fragile Absolute Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For?. London: Verso, 2000.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Puppet and the Dwarf. The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.