2021-01Forum
On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations

Abstract:

This paper starts with a detailed analysis of Jan Assmann’s qualitative distinction between cultural memory and communicative memory. The purpose of this analysis is to highlight both the strengths and the limitations of this seminal distinction, and to also reflect on what cultural theorists and contemporary artists could learn through Assmann’s distinction since artistic production also employs cultural memory formats that do not exclude cultural traditions in their materializations. In line with these considerations, this paper aims to disentangle what “tradition” means to contemporary artists. Following Edward Shils and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy of “tradition,” the paper argues that cultural tradition does not necessarily have an oppressive character and the rebellion and suspicion against it is at the heart of tradition itself. Thus, the traditional/contemporary binary can be precluded by reconsidering how “tradition” and “traditional” are conceptualized considering philosophy of tradition and artistic memory.

Keywords:

cultural traditions, cultural memory, communicative memory, contemporary art, tradition, artistic memory

How to cite:

Asavei, Maria Alina. “On Tradition and Cultural Memory in Contemporary Art: Theoretical Considerations.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 5, no. 1 (2021): 126-139. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008.

Author:

Maria Alina Asavei
Institute of International Studies, Charles University, Prague
Pekařská 10, 158 00 Praha 5 – Jinonice, Czech Republic
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-8044
maria.asavei@fsv.cuni.cz

References:

Asavei, Maria-Alina. Aesthetics, Disinterestedness and Effectiveness in Political Art. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018.

Assmann, Jan. Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2006.

Assmann, Jan. “Communicative and Cultural Memory.” In Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, edited by Astrid Erll and Ansgar Nünning, 109-18. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter 2008. Also available online: http://archiv.ub.uniheidelberg.de/propylaeumdok/1774/1/Assmann_Communicative_and_cultural_memory_2008.pdf.

Assmann, Jan. “The Cultural Memory.” HENN, June 10, 2009. http://www.henn.com/en/research/cultural-memory.

Assmann, Jan, and John Czaplicka. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique 65, (Spring-Summer 1995): 125-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/488538.

Berliner, David. “The Abuses of Memory: Reflections on the Memory Boom in Anthropology.” Anthropological Quarterly 78, no. 1 (Winter 2005): 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2005.0001.

Bernstein, Richard J. “Review of Jan Assmann, Religion and Cultural Memory.” Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Bryn Mayer Review of Comparative Literature 6, no. 1 (Winter 2007): 1-8. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/303071574.pdf.

Cover, Jan A., and Glenn A. Hartz. “Are Leibnizian Monads Spatial?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 11, no. 3 (July 1994): 295-316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27744630.

Davis, Ben. “Columbia Student’s Striking Mattress Performance.” Artnet, September 4, 2014. http://news.artnet.com/art-world/columbia-students-striking-mattress-performance-92346.

Dickie, George. The Art Circle. A Theory of Art. New York: Haven, 1984.

Dickie, George. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1974.

Erll, Astrid. Memory in Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670.

Erll, Astrid, and Ann Rigney. Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217384.

Gadamer, Hans Georg. Truth and Method. New York: Bloomsbury, 2004.

Galanin, Nicholas. “Out of Line: Nicholas Galanin Rejects the Traditional / Contemporary Binary.” Walker, March 26, 2018. https://walkerart.org/magazine/nicholas-galanin-indigenous-art-contemporary-traditional.

Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretations of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

Gibbons, Joan. Contemporary Art and Memory: Images of Recollection and Remembrance. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755604012.

Halbwachs, Maurice. Les Cadres Sociaux de la Mémoire [Social Frameworks of Memory]. Paris: Albin Michel, 1994.

Hirsch, Marianne. “The Generation of Postmemory.” Poetics Today, 29, no. 1 (2008): 103-28. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-019.

Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger. The Invention of Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Keating, Michael. “Culture as Social Science.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating, 99-117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Kukkonen, Karin. “Popular Cultural Memory: Comics, Communities and Context Knowledge.” Nordicom Review 29, no. 2 (2008): 261-73. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0190.

Levy, Daniel, and Natan Sznaider. “Memory Unbound: The Holocaust and the Formation of Cosmopolitan Memory.” European Journal of Social Theory 5, no. 1 (2002): 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431002005001002.

Mallon, Sean. “Against Tradition.” The Contemporary Pacific 22, no. 2 (2013): 362-81. DOI: 10.1353/cp.2010.0024. https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2010.0024.

Mann, Thomas. Wälsungenblut. Berlin: Fisher Taschenbuch, 2019.

Martore, Paolo. “The Contemporary Artwork between Meaning and Cultural Identity.” Ceroart 4 (2009):1-8. https://doi.org/10.4000/ceroart.1287.

Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713465.001.0001.

Ross, Marc Howard. “Culture and Identity in Contemporary Political Analysis.” In Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997): 42-80.

Shils, Edward. Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.

Srinivasan, Deepak. “Changes in Contemporary Art Practices: 2 Case Studies from Asia and Europe.” Asia-Europe Foundation, June 15, 2011. http://culture360.asef.org/magazine/changes-in-contemporary-art-practices-2-case-studies-from-asia-and-europe/.

Stronciwilk, Agata. “Food, Emotions and Memory in Polish Contemporary Art.” Creative Taste Buds. https://creativetastebuds.dk/experience-the-contributions/abstract-food-emotions-and-memory-in-polish-contemporary-art/.

Warburg, Aby. The Renewal of Pagan Antiquity: Contributions to the Cultural History of the European Renaissance.  New York: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities, 1999.

Wendt, Albert. “Towards a New Oceania.” In Writers in East West Encounter, edited by Amirthanayagam, Guy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04943-1_12.

Wieand, Jeffrey. “Can There Be an Institutional Theory of Art?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39, no. 4 (Summer 1981): 409-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/430240.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.