Abstract:
This essay proposes a visualist ontological framework for understanding design, rooted fundamentally in the theories of emergent properties and affordances. Opposing functionalist and intentionalist paradigms, the framework underscores design’s visuality and relational engagement as its core ontological elements. The concepts of emergent properties and affordances are presented as deeply interconnected, reflecting their philosophical and practical relationship within the ontology of design. Emergent properties are conceptualized as qualities that do not reside intrinsically within individual components but instead arise through the dynamic relational interactions among parts within a system, often exemplified in complex, non-linear systems. I demonstrate, however, that even singular, discrete design objects encapsulate complexity and exhibit emergent qualities. Design’s ontological structure extends beyond its planned form to include these emergent qualities and open affordances rooted in visual surface configurations and relational engagement, because design inherently exists in relations – not only with users but also with other objects and environments. Relatedly, affordances elucidate how visual and material configurations invite specific actions, enabling meanings and functions to be continually redefined through ongoing interactions. The integration of these theories offers a comprehensive, non-reductionist account of design’s ontology, emphasizing its inherently relational, dynamic, and open-ended nature as central to its identity and operative capacity.
Keywords:
design, definition, ontology, functionalism, emergence, affordance, intentionalism
How to cite:
Gal, Michalle. “Design’s Ontology: Emergent Properties and Affordance.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 3 (2025): 13-42. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0023.
Author:
Michalle Gal
Unit of History and Philosophy, Master Program of Design, Shenkar College
12 Anne Frank St., Ramat Gan, Israel
michalle.gal@shenkar.ac.il
References:
Arnheim, Rudolf. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye, The New Version. Expanded and rev. ed. with some new ill. [Nachdr.], 50th anniversary printing. University of California Press, 2009.
Arnheim, Rudolf. “From Function to Expression.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23, no. 1 (1964): 29-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/428136.
Arnheim, Rudolf. Visual Thinking. University of California Press, 1969.
Attfield, Judy. Wild Things: The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Materializing Culture. Berg, 2000.
Broad, Charlie D. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1925.
Carrasco Barranco, Matilde. “The Aesthetic Appreciation of Design Objects: Form, Functionality, Performativity.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 48, (Spring 2025): 71-83.
Chemero, Anthony. “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15, no. 2 (2003): 181-95. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.
Chemero, Anthony. “What We Perceive When We Perceive Affordances: Commentary on Michaels (2000) ‘Information, Perception, and Action.’” Ecological Psychology 13, no. 2 (2001): 111-16. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1302_3.
Dijk, Ludger van, and Erik Rietveld. “Foregrounding Sociomaterial Practice in Our Understanding of Affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework.” Frontiers in Psychology 7, (January 2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01969.
Dreyfuss, Henry. Designing for People. Skyhorse Publishing Inc., 2003.
Dyson, George. Darwin Among the Machines: The Evolution of Global Intelligence. Perseus Books, 1998.
Flusser, Vilém. The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design. Reaktion, 1999.
Forsey, Jane. “Design and Beauty: Functional Style.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 58, no. 1 (2025): 36-43.
Fry, Roger. Vision and Design. Chatto and Windus, 1920.
Gal, Michalle. “Design and Rationalism: A Visualist Critique of Instrumental Rationalism.” The Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 47, no. 3 (2025).
Gal, Michalle. “Design, Everydayness, and the Illusion of Function.” In Designing Everyday Experience – Objects, Space, Habits. Edited by Elisabetta Di Stefano, Lisa Giombini, and Bálint Veres. Springer, 2026.
Gal, Michalle. “Is Generative AI in Aesthetics Really New?: The Visualist Perspective.” Contemporary Aesthetics (Special Volume) 13, (2025).
Gal, Michalle. Visual Metaphors and Aesthetics. Bloomsbury Publication, 2022.
Gal, Michalle, and Jonathan Ventura. Introduction to Design Theory: Philosophy, Critique, History and Practice. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.
Gibson, James J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. 1st ed. Psychology Press, 2015.
Gibson, James J. “Pictures, Perspective, and Perception.” Daedalus 89, no. 1 (1960): 216-27.
Gombrich, Ernst H. “On Physiognomic Perception.” Daedalus 89, no. 1 (1960): 228-41. JSTOR.
Hillis, W. Daniel. “Intelligence as an Emergent Behavior; Or, The Songs of Eden.” Daedalus 117, no. 1 (1988): 175-89.
Hodder, Ian. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
Humphreys, Paul. Emergence: A Philosophical Account. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Ianniello, Antonio, and David Habets. “Seeing Differently: Infinity Pool as a Prototypical Exploration of Perceptual Field Reconfiguration Processes.” Aisthesis 19, no. 1 (2025): 159-79. https://doi.org/10.7413/2035-8466048.
Kistler, Max. “New Perspectives on Reduction and Emergence in Physics, Biology and Psychology.” Synthese 151, no. 3 (2006): 311-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9014-3.
Koutamanis, Alexander. “The Case for Design Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 38, no. 1 (2026, published online September 2025): 48-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2025.2559356.
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Margolin, Victor. The Politics of the Artificial: Essays on Design and Design Studies. University of Chicago Press, 2002. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo3623186.html.
Mogul, Jeffrey C. “Emergent (Mis)Behavior vs. Complex Software Systems.” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 40, no. 4 (2006): 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1218063.1217964.
Norman, Donald A. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design.” Interactions 6, no. 3 (May-June 1999): 38-42.
Norman, Donald A. The Design of Everyday Things. Rev. and expanded ed. Basic Books, 2013.
Øien, Turid Borgestrand, Sidse Grangaard, and Victoria L. Lygum. “Exploring the Dynamics of Architecture with the Concept of Affordance.” Philosophical Psychology 37, no. 7 (2024): 1858-877. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2273400.
Pols, Auke J. K. “Characterising Affordances: The Descriptions-of-Affordances-Model.” Design Studies 33, no. 2 (2012): 113-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.007.
Rietveld, Erik, and Julian Kiverstein. “A Rich Landscape of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 26, no. 4 (2014): 325-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035.
Saltzer, Jerome H., and Frans Kaashoek. Principles of Computer System Design: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.
Tversky, Barbara, and Bridgette Martin Hard. “Embodied and Disembodied Cognition: Spatial Perspective-Taking.” Cognition 110, no. 1 (2009): 124-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008.
You, hsiao-chen, and Kuohsiang Chen. “Applications of Affordance and Semantics in Product Design.” Design Studies 28, no. 1 (January 2007): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002.
Zacks, Jeffrey M., and Barbara Tversky. “Multiple Systems for Spatial Imagery: Transformations of Objects and Bodies.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 5, no. 4 (2005): 271-306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0504_1.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.