Abstract:
This paper defends that gastronomy is a medium for artistic expression. It explores two arguments frequently used to defend that gastronomy is not an artistic medium: the problem of consumption and the asymmetry between aesthetic judgments and judgments of personal preference. The former defends that gastronomy and fine arts are fundamentally distinct because their products have very different characteristics. The latter defends that aesthetic judgments and judgments of personal preference differ in that the former are intersubjectively valid, while the latter are only subjectively valid. The paper counters the first argument by suggesting that accepting the problem of consumption leads to an undesirable consequence: the exclusion of certain art forms that are integral to artistic practice. In response to the second argument, the paper contends that empirical evidence from different sources suggests that the asymmetry between aesthetic judgments and judgments of personal preference fails to hold true in numerous contexts.
Keywords:
gastronomy, fine arts, consumption, aesthetic judgments, judgments of personal preference
How to cite:
Bordonaba-Plou, David. “Is Gastronomy a Medium for Artistic Expression? The Problem of Consumption and the Purported Asymmetry Between Aesthetic Judgments and Judgments of Personal Preference.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 2 (2025): 202-229. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0019.
Author:
David Bordonaba-Plou
Faculty of Philosophy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Plaza Menéndez Pelayo, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-9733
davbordo@ucm.es
References:
British Broadcasting Corporation. “Banksy’s Balloon Girl Chosen as Nation’s Favourite Artwork.” BBC, July 25, 2017. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-40717821.
Berleant, Arnold. “Aesthetics and the Contemporary Arts.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29, no. 2 (1970): 155-68.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Cameron, Ross P. “There are No Things That are Musical Works.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48, no. 3 (2008): 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn022.
Caplan, Ben, and Carl Matheson. “Defending Musical Perdurantism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 46, no. 1 (2006): 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayj004.
Carroll, Noël. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 1999.
Cova, Florian, and Nicolas Pain. “Can Folk Aesthetics Ground Aesthetic Realism?” The Monist 95, no. 2 (2012): 241-63. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201295214.
Cova, Florian, Amanda Garcia, and Shen-yi Liao. “Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics.” Philosophy Compass 10, no. 11 (2015): 927-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12271.
Cova, Florian, Cristopher I. Olivola, Edouard Machery, et al. “De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Alleged Intersubjective Validity of Aesthetic Judgment.” Mind & Language 34, no. 3 (2019): 317-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12210.
Danto, Arthur. “The End of Art.” In The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Dodd, Julian. Works of Music: An Essay in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284375.001.0001.
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Hegel, Georg W. F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, vol. 1. Translated by Thomas M. Knox. New York: Clarendon Pres, 1988.
Kames, Henry Home. Elements of Criticism, vol. 1. Edited by Peter Jones. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2005.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by James C. Meredith. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Kennedy, Maev. “Banksy Stencil Soars Past Hay Wain as UK’s Favourite Work of Art.” The Guardian, July 25, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/jul/26/banksy-balloon-girl-hay-wain-favourite-uk-work-of-art-constable-poll-nation
Kosmeyer, Karolyn. “Delightful, Delicious, Disgusting.” In Food and Philosophy: Eat, Think and Be Merry. Edited by Fritz Allhof and Dave Monroe, 145-61. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
Kosmeyer, Karolyn. Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Levinson, Jerrold. “What a Musical Work Is.” The Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 1 (1980): 5-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025596.
McNally, Louise, and Isidora Stojanovic. “Aesthetic Adjectives.” In Semantics of Aesthetic Judgments. Edited by James O. Young, 17-37. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714590.003.0002.
Monroe, Dave. “Can Food Be Art? The Problem of Consumption.” In Food and Philosophy: Eat, Think and Be Merry. Edited by Fritz Allhof and Dave Monroe, 133-44. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
Moruzzi, Caterina. “Every Performance Is a Stage: Musical Stage Theory as a Novel Account for the Ontology of Musical Works.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76, no. 3 (2018): 341-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12579.
Osborne, Peter. “Art Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Criticism, Art History and Contemporary Art.” Art History 27, no. 4 (2004): 651-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00442.x.
Osborne, Peter. “Modernisms and Mediations.” In Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Edited by Francis Halsall, Julia Alejandra Jansen and Tony O’Connor, 163-77. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503627253-013.
Plato. Phaedo. Translated by David Gallop. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Reyburn, Scott. “Banksy Painting Self-Destructs After Fetching $1.4 Million at Sotheby’s.” The New York Times, October 6, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/arts/design/uk-banksy-painting-sothebys.html.
Shiner, Larry. The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Stojanovic, Isidora. “Talking about Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments, and Relative Truth.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30, no. 6 (2007): 691-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9030-5.
Sundell, Timothy. “Aesthetic Negotiation.” In Semantics of Aesthetics Judgments. Edited by James O. Young, 82-105. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714590.003.0005
Tillman, Chris. “Musical Materialism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51, no. 1 (2011): 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq028.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.