Abstract:
I will defend a thesis about the proper way to aesthetically appreciate instances of design that incorporate natural elements. My main case studies will be drawn from the work of fashion designer Alexander McQueen, such as a bodice incorporating mussel shells from the Voss collection (Spring/Summer 2001). I will defend a version of cognitivism about the proper aesthetic appreciation of nature incorporated in these design elements, according to which a certain amount of knowledge about one’s object of appreciation is necessary for its proper aesthetic appreciation. The knowledge I will suggest is necessary concerns whether something is natural or artificial, knowledge of natural kinds, as well as an awareness of the contrast between the appearance of something and its nature. This account of the aesthetic appreciation of design incorporating natural elements can be developed to specify what is aesthetically praiseworthy in certain instances of sustainable fashion.
Keywords:
aesthetic appreciation of nature, design, fashion design, perfume, cognitivism, formalism
How to cite:
Brozzo, Chiara. “On the Proper Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in Design.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 3 (2025): 43-60. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0024.
Author:
Chiara Brozzo
Department of Philosophy, University of Birmingham
Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1217-1224
c.brozzo@bham.ac.uk
References:
Budd, Malcolm. “The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 36, no. 3 (1996): 207-23.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful (1757). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Carlson, Allen. “Nature, Aesthetic Judgment, and Objectivity.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40, no. 1 (1981): 15-27.
Carlson, Allen. Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press, 2009.
Contesi, Filippo. “How Transparent is Disgust?” European Journal of Philosophy 25, no. 4 (2017): 1810-823.
Contesi, Filippo. “Korsmeyer on Fiction and Disgust.” British Journal of Aesthetics 55, no. 1 (2015): 109-16.
Hamilton, Andy. “Indeterminacy and Reciprocity: Contrasts and Connections between Natural and Artistic Beauty.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 5, no. 3 (2006): 183-93.
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement (1790). Translated by James H. Bernard. New York: Macmillan, 1951.
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. “Terrible Beauties.” In Kieran, Matthew, Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Savoring disgust: The foul and the fair in aesthetics. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Turin, Luca, & Tania Sanchez. Perfumes: The AZ Guide. Profile Books, 2010.
Victoria and Albert Museum. “‘Mussel’ bodice.” Accessed November 1, 2025. https://www.vam.ac.uk/museumofsavagebeauty/mcq/mussel-bodice/.
Victoria and Albert Museum. “Nature and Organic Materials.” Accessed November 1, 2025. https://www.vam.ac.uk/museumofsavagebeauty/nature-and-organic-materials/.
Victoria and Albert Museum. “Necklace.” Accessed November 1, 2025. https://www.vam.ac.uk/museumofsavagebeauty/mcq/necklace/.
Walton, Kendall L. “Categories of Art.” The Philosophical Review 79, no. 3 (1970): 334-67.
Zangwill, Nick. “Clouds of Illusion in the Aesthetics of Nature.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63, no. 252 (2013): 576-96.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.