Abstract:
Chairs, cups, books, and utensils populate our everyday lives and are protagonists of much of our ordinary aesthetic experience. It would seem natural, therefore, for the philosophy of design and everyday aesthetics to constitute intersecting fields of inquiry. Yet the contemporary philosophical debate on the aesthetics of design, articulated through three main approaches – formalist, functionalist, and performative – has not offered a fully developed account of this relationship. This article develops a meta-theoretical critique showing how the functionalist approach risks being of little relevance to everyday aesthetics. Building on this critique, the article proposes expanding the performative approach by introducing a distinction between applicative uses, which realize an already given function, and constitutive uses, which institute new practical states of affairs through creative appropriation. This distinction allows for a new working definition of “design” better aligned with everyday aesthetics: one that focuses on the constitutive force of use as a legitimate source of aesthetic properties.
Keywords:
everyday aesthetics, performative aesthetic properties, design, constitutive use, applicative use
How to cite:
Favara-Kurkowski, Monika. “Performative Aesthetic Properties in Everyday Design Practice.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 3 (2025): 61-83. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0025.
Author:
Monika Favara-Kurkowski
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw
Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6731-6454
m.favara@uw.edu.pl
References:
Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception.” In The Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford University Press, 2002.
Bamford, Greg. “Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis.” In Architectural Science and Design in Harmony: Proceedings of the Joint ANZAScA / ADTRA Conference, Sydney, July 10-12, 1990. Edited by Jim Plume. University of NSW School of Architecture, 1991.
Bertinetto, Alessandro. Estetica dell’improvvisazione (Aesthetics of Improvisation). Bologna: Il mulino, 2021.
Carrasco Barranco, Matilde. “The Aesthetic Appreciation of Design Objects: Form, Functionality, Performativity.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 48, no. 1 (Spring 2025): 71–83.
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Davies, Stephen. “Aesthetic Judgments, Artworks and Functional Beauty.” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): 224–41.
Dewey, John. Art as Experience. Berkeley Publ. Group, 2005.
Escobar, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Duke University Press, 2018.
Favara-Kurkowski, Monika. “Aesthetics of Design. Critical Analysis of Contemporary Discussions in the Philosophy of Design.” PhD diss., University of Warsaw, 2024.
Favara-Kurkowski, Monika. “Everyday Design: The Aesthetic Dimension of Alternative Use.” In Multidisciplinary Aspects of Design. Objects, Processes, Experiences and Narratives. Edited by Francesca Zanella, Giampiero Bosoni, Elisabetta Di Stefano, et al., 139-46. Springer Series in Design and Innovation. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49811-4_13.
Forsey, Jane. The Aesthetics of Design. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Forsey, Jane. “‘The Useful-Beautiful Couplet’: On the Aesthetic Appraisal of Designed Objects.” In Multidisciplinary Aspects of Design. Objects, Processes, Experiences and Narratives. Edited by Francesca Zanella, Giampiero Bosoni, Elisabetta Di Stefano, et al., 11-19. Springer Series in Design and Innovation. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49811-4_2
Fry, Tony. A New Design Philosophy: An Introduction to Defuturing. Sydney: UNSW Press, 1999.
Gal, Michalle. “Design’s Ontology: Emergent Properties and Affordance.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 9, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2025.0023.
Irvin, Sherri. “The Pervasiveness of the Aesthetic in Ordinary Experience.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 48, no. 1 (2008), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/aym039.
Irvin, Sherri. “Scratching an Itch.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66, no. 1 (2008), 25-35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40206303.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. Translated by James Creed Meredith. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Knabb, Ken. Situationist International Anthology. Bureau of Public Secrets, 2007.
Kroes, Peter. “Design Methodology and the Nature of Technical Artefacts.” Design Studies 23, no. 3 (May 2002): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00039-4.
Kurtz, Robert. “Sein come Design – Dall’estetica della merce all’estetica della crisi (Sein as Design – From the aesthetics of goods to the aesthetics of the crisis).” Agalma 1, (2000). https://www.agalmarivista.org/articoli-uscite/robert-kurz-sein-come-design/.
Leddy, Thomas. “Design and Definitions: Reflections on the Question of ‘What is Design?’.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 58, no. 1 (2025): 7–12.
Leddy, Thomas. “Everyday Surface Aesthetic Qualities: ‘Neat,’ ‘Messy,’ ‘Clean,’ ‘Dirty.’” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53, no. 3 (1995): 259–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/431351.
Nguyen, C. Thi. “The Arts of Action.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20, no. 14 (May 2020): 1–27. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0020.014.
Papanek, Victor. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. 2nd ed. Academy Chicago, 1985.
Parsons, Glenn. The Philosophy of Design. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Parsons, Glenn, and Allen Carlson. Functional Beauty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Preston, Beth. “The Birth of Planning Out of the Spirit of Improvisation: The Iceberg Model.” In Philosophy of Improvisation: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Theory and Practice. Edited by Susanne Ravn, Simon Høffding, and James McGuirk. Routledge, 2021.
Preston, Beth. A Philosophy of Material Culture: Action, Function, and Mind. New York: Routledge, 2013.
Saito, Yuriko. Aesthetics of the Familiar: Everyday Life and World-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Saito, Yuriko. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Stecker, Robert. Intersections of value: art, nature, and the everyday. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Tassinari, Virginia, Ezio Manzini, Arturo Escobar, Liesbeth Huybrechts, and Annalinda De Rosa, “The Politics of Nature. Design for an Ontological Turn,” Paper presented at 16th Participatory Design Conference “Participation(s) Otherwise” (PDC2020), Universidad de Caldas, January, 2020.
Vardouli, Theodora. “Making Use: Attitudes to Human-Artifact Engagements.” Design Studies 41, (2015): 137-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.002.
Wright, Stephen. Toward a Lexicon of Usership. Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum, 2014. https://constructlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Toward-a-lexicon-of-usership.pdf.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.