2019-01Thematic Section
Logical Connection Argument from the Perspective of Exploratory Behaviors

Abstract:

In the most general terms, the Logical Connection Argument (LCA) states that theory and practice are two inseparable aspects of the same thing. Every action (or practice), linguistic or otherwise, is an indivisible unity of content and the means by which it is expressed. Alternatively, we may talk of the inseparability of content and form, meaning and act of expression, goal and method or means of its realization, and so forth. The argument was meant to prove that intentions cannot be treated as causes in social scientific explanation, but it did it at the cost of making any meta-analysis, and hence, critique, highly problematic. My position is that the LCA is indeed logical, and hence irrefutable. Nonetheless, we can distinguish between “raw” and “refined” versions of the argument. The refined version maintains that while ultimately and ideally, the content and means of expression presuppose one another in the sense that a content is inconceivable without a form, and vice versa, in reality there is never a perfect match between aims and methods. In typical circumstances, we do not have a precise sense of what we are doing; the meaning of our actions is gradually discovered in the course of exploratory behaviors, of which (immanent) critique is an indispensable part. In this contribution, I venture to examine the problem from a neuropsychological perspective with the view to showing in exactly what sense and to what extent explorative behaviors and associated motivations preside over other activities. I argue that content is always underdetermined with respect to its form (and vice versa), and hence the alleged internal connection between them is not a given, but rather amounts to a regulative principle which motivates mutual adjustments.

Keywords:

Logical Connection Argument, meaning, content, means of expression, goal-directed action, performativity

How to cite:

Michalska, Anna. “Logical Connection Argument from the Perspective of Exploratory Behaviors.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3, no. 1(7) (2019): 78–91. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0006.

Author:

Anna Michalska
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
72 Nowy Świat Street, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-4556
amichalska@ifispan.waw.pl

References:

Apel, Karl-Otto. Understanding and Explanation. Translated by Georgia Warnke. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1984.

Apel, Karl-Otto. Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Edited by Glyn Adey and David Fisbey. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1998.

Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Translated by Randall Johnson. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Cromwell, Steven. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139548908

Damasio, Antonio. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Hartcourt, 1999.

Damasio, Antonio. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing of the Conscious Brain. New York: Vintage Books, 2010.

Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60, no. 23 (November 1963): 685–700. https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177

Dewey, John. “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology.” The Psychological Review 4, no. 3 (July 1896): 357–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070405

Donald, Merlin. The Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages of the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

Gallagher, Shaun and Dan Zahavi. The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge, 2008.

Gray, Jeffrey. “A General Model of the Limbic System and Basal Ganglia: Applications to Schizophrenia and Compulsive Behavior of the Obsessive Type.” Revue Neurologique 150 (August-September 1994): 605–13.

Gray, Jeffrey and Neil McNaughton. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Function of the Septo-Hippocampal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press 1984.

Johnson, Mark. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001.

Jung, Carl. Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Edited by Herbert Read, Michael Fordham, and Gerhard Adler. Translated by F. R.C. Hull. London: Routledge, 1968.

Klein, Gary A., Karol G. Ross, Brian M. Moon, Devorah E. Klein, Robert R. Hoffman, and Erik Hollnagel. “Macrocognition.” Journal of IEEE Intelligent System 18, no. 3 (May–June 2003): 81–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2003.1200735.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

Landesmann, Charles. “The New Dualism in the Philosophy of Mind.” Review of Metaphysics 19, no. 2 (December 1965): 329–45.

Laughlin, Tom Laughlin. Jungian Theory and Therapy. Volume 2. Los Angeles: Panarion Press, 1982.

Laundan, Larry. Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debates. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

Middleton, Frank and Peter Strick. “Anatomical Evidence for Cerebellar and Basal Ganglia Involvement in Higher Cognitive Function.” Science 5184, no. 266 (October 1994): 458–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7939688.

Middleton, Frank and Peter Strick. “Cerebellar Projections to the Prefrontal Cortex of the Primate.” The Journal of Neuroscience 21, no. 2 (January 2001): 700–12. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00700.2001.

Panksepp, Jaak. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1962.

Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1966.

Stuart-Fox, Martin. “The Origins of Causal Cognition in Early Hominins.” Biology and Philosophy 30, no. 2 (March 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9462-y.

Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Joseph Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 5 (October 2005): 675–735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129.

Von Wright, Georg H. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971.

Winch, Peter. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated C.K. Ogden. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company, 1922.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.