2018-01Thematic Section
Reflective Judgment and Symbolic Functions: On the Possibility of a Phenomenology of Person

Abstract:

The following paper seeks to examine whether, from the standpoint of a transcendental idealist, it is possible to have a phenomenology that can adequately disclose the nature and activity of person. First I establish that symbols are intuitive concretizations of the activity of person/Geist, and thus symbols are available to phenom- enological description. Then I raise the question of whether reflective judgment can be understood as a part of a possible phenomenology. I come to the conclusion that yes, the process of reflective judgment is phenomenologically available; reflective judgment offers an experience of “what it is like to be a person” (meaning a transcendental process of symbol creation). However, it is clear that reflective judgment must borrow a rule from phenomenal/determinate experience in order to imaginatively analogize the transcendental creativity of person. Thus, all that is available to phenomenology is an analogy of being person, and not person itself.

Keywords:

Cassirer, Kant, reflective judgment, personalism, phenomenology, transcendental anthropology

How to cite:

Kemling, Jared. “Reflective Judgment and Symbolic Functions: On the Possibility of a Phenomenology of Person.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2, no. 1(3) (2018): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.26319/3915.

Author:

Jared Kemling
Department of Philosophy, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

References:

Auxier, Randall. “Ernst Cassirer and Susanne Langer.” In A Handbook of Whiteheadian Process Thought, vol. 2, eds. Michel Weber and Will Desmond, 552–570. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008.

Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944.

Cassirer, Ernst. “ Form and Technique.” Translated by John Michael Krois and Wilson McClelland Dunlavey. In Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings, edited by Aud Sissel Hoel and Ingvild Folkvord. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Cassirer, Ernst. Substance and Function And Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Translated by William Curtis Swabey and Marie Collins Swabey. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Logic of the Cultural Sciences. Translated by Stephen G. Lofts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume One: Language. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume Two: Mythical Thought. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume Three: The Phenomenology of Knowledge. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms Volume Four: The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms, edited by John Michael Krois and Donald Phillip Verene. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Arnold Vincent Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

Husserl, Edmund. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Translated by William Ralph Boyce Gibson. New York: Collier, 1962.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987.

Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Logic. Translated by J. Michael Young. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter Harold Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

Peirce, Charles Sanders The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. Edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur Walter Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1958.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.