2024-01Thematic Section
Agalmatophilic Pygmalions: Burke and Winckelmann on the Beautiful and the Sublime

Abstract:

There is a good chance that “each critic becomes a Pygmalion” (as Leo Curran put it) when they bring the work of art to life in their narcissistic (and almost amorous) attention, unfolding its meaning so that they should be able to write their own interpretation. The starting point of the present text is the perfection of sculptural forms, and the author discusses “traditional” aesthetic concepts: the beautiful and the sublime along with the difference and interplay of the two qualities, bearing in mind their variations and relations. The framework is provided by the occurrence of these two in the discourses on the self and taste in the eighteenth-century while the focus is on subjective criticism concerning the beautiful versus the sublime in the artistic and sensual experience of statues. Within the given framework, the author is planning to force Edmund Burke, stiffened by the experience of the sublime, and Winckelmann, softened by the sight of the Greek statues, into a dialogue on individual taste.

Keywords:

self, sublime, beautiful, sexes, statues, Burke, Winckelmann

How to cite:

Antal, Éva. “Agalmatophilic Pygmalions: Burke and Winckelmann on the Beautiful and the Sublime.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 8, no. 1 (2024):  39-68. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2024.0003.

Author:

Éva Antal
Eszterházy Károly Catholic University,
HU-3300 Eger, Eszterházy tér 1, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-6470
antal.eva@uni-eszterhazy.hu

References:

Antal, Eva. “Transgressing the Boundaries of Reason: Burke’s Poetic (Miltonic) Reading of the Sublime.” In Writing and Constructing the Self in Great Britain in the Long Eighteenth-Century, edited by John Baker, Marion Leclair, and Allan Ingram, 210-27. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526123374.00019.

Ashfield, Andrew, and Peter de Bolla, eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Baker, John and Marion Leclair. “Introduction. The Written Self.” In Writing and Constructing the Self in Great Britain in the Long Eighteenth-Century, edited by John Baker, Marion Leclair, and Allan Ingram, 1-24. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 2019. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526123374.

Balfour, Ian. “Torso: (The) Sublime Sex, Beautiful Bodies, and the Matter of the Text.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 39, no. 3 (2006): 323-36. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2006.0001.

Brandes, Peter. “Beauty as the Middle between Two Extremes: Encountering the Aesthetics of Equilibrium in Winckelmann’s Theory of Art.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 92, no. 2 (2017): 143-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168890.2017.1297611.

Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Edited by David Womersley. Penguin Books, 2004.

Cox, Stephen D. “The Stranger Within Thee: Concepts of the Self in Late-Eighteenth-Century Literature. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1980.

Curran, Leo C. “Transformation and Anti-Augustanism in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.Arethusa 5, no. 1 (1972): 71-91.

Davis, Whitney. Queer Beauty: Sexuality and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Freud and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7312/davi14690.

de Man, Paul. Aesthetic Ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

Dickie, George. The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth-Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195096804.001.0001.

Engell, James. The Creative Imagination. Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674333253.

Fox, Christopher. Locke and the Scriblerians. Identity and Consciousness in Early Eighteenth-Century Britain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.

Gasché, Rodolphe. “…And the Beautiful? Revisiting Edmund Burke’s ‘Double Aesthetics’.” In The Sublime from Antiquity to the Present, edited by Timothy Costelloe, 24–36. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978920.004.

Hegel, Georg W. F. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art. Translated by Thomas M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.

Hegel, Georg W. F. Vorlesungen über die Asthetik. I. Werke 13. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. Edited by Nicholas Walker. Translated by James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Ästhetischen Urtheilskraft. Werke in zwölf Bänden. Band 10. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977. http://www.zeno.org/nid/20009190430.

Kant, Immanuel. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings. Edited and introduced by Patrick Frierson. Translated by Paul Guyer. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Roger Woolhouse. Penguin Books, 2004.

Noggle, James. The Temporality of Taste in Eighteenth-Century British Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642434.001.0001.

O’Neill, Daniel I. The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271034867.

Potts, Alex. Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000.

Richir, Marc. “L’Expérience du Sublime.” Magazine Littéraire, no. 309: Kant et la modernité, (Avril 1993): 35-37.

Spacks, Patricia Meyer. Privacy. Concealing the Eighteenth-Century Self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226768618.001.0001.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums. München: Edition Deutsche Bibliothek, 1987.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. The History of Ancient Art Among the Greeks. Translated by G. Henry Lodge. London: John Chapman, 1850.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Kleine Schriften, Vorreden, Entwürfe. Edited by von Walther Rehm. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894684.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Reflections on the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks: With Instructions for the Connoisseur, and an Essay on Grace in Works of Art. Translated by Henry Fusseli. London: Kessinger Publishing, 1765.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. “Von der Fähigkeit der Empfindung des Schönen in der Kunst.” In Kleine Schriften und Briefe (Band 1): Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums, 173-207. Leipzig, 1925.

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Writings on Art. Selected and edited by David Irwin. London: Phaidon, 1972.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.