2022-04Thematic Section
The Logics of Sense and the Russian-Ukrainian War

Abstract:

The study examines Russian philosopher Andrei Smirnov’s conception of the logic of sense as a way of providing exposition of the reasons for the Russian-Ukrainian war. The logic of sense is simultaneously a theory of rules of sense-setting and the very rules of sense-setting created by a culture and the ruling culture. Smirnov thinks that the reasons lie in the clash between common-human European culture and its logic of sense and all-human Russian culture and its logic of sense. Smirnov sees no difference between Russians and Ukrainians and considers the Ukrainian culture an essential and indispensable part of Russian culture. Therefore, the expansion of the common-human European culture to Ukraine challenges the all-human Russian culture.

Keywords:

civilization, culture, logic of sense, Russian-Ukrainian war

How to cite:

Raikhert, Kostiantyn. “The Logics of Sense and the Russian-Ukrainian War.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 6, no. 4 (2022):  96-106. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0037.

Author:

Kostiantyn Raikhert
Department of Philosophy, Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University
2 Dvoryans’ka St, 65000 Odesa, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-9128
k.rayhert@onu.edu.ua

References:

Danilevsky, Nikolay. Rossiya i Yeuropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: Terra, 2008.

Deleuze, Giles. Logique du sens. Paris : Minuit, 1969.

Ibn Sina Foundation. “Islam v zerkale nauki. YEUROPA vs VOSTOK. Kak ne stat etnicheskim materialom?” [“Islam in the Mirror of Science. EUROPE vs EAST. How Does One Not Become Ethnic Supplies?”]. YouTube video, 1:50:22. March 19, 2022. https://youtu.be/6vXYAV89Yao.

Huntington, Samuel P. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, no. 72 (1993): 22-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621.

Konev, Vladimir. “Dve kontseptsii logiki smysla: Zhil Delyoz i Andrey Smirnov, Chast 1” [“Two Concepts of the Logic of Sense: Gilles Deleuze and Andrey Smirnov, Part 1”]. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 11 (2016): 37-47.

Konev, Vladimir. “Dve kontseptsii logiki smysla: Zhil Delyoz is Andrey Smirnov, Chast 2” [“Two Concepts of the Logic of Sense: Gilles Deleuze and Andrey Smirnov, Part 2”]. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 8 (2017): 80-88.

Pruzhinin, Boris I., Vladislav A. Lektorsky, Sergey Yu. Borodai, Nadezhda A. Kasavina, Vladimir A. Konev, Igor F. Mikhailov, Konstantin A. Pavlov-Pinus et al. “Kontseptsia ‘logiki smysla’ A. V. Smirnova i filosofiya soznaniya (materialy ‘kruglogo stola’)” [“The A. V. Smirnov’s Conception of ‘The Logic of Sense’ and the Philosophy of Mind (‘Round Table’ Proceedings)”]. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 6 (2022): 5-44. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-6-5-44.

The Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. “Kruglyy stol ‘Tvorcheskoe nasledie N. Ya. Danilevskogo: istoriya i sovremennost’” [“Round Table ‘The N. Y. Danilevsky’s Creative Heritage: The History and the Present’”]. YouTube video, 3:32:35. March 15, 2022. https://youtu.be/9I8AET6B-SY.

Lazarev, Vladimir. “Sobornost.” In Vol. 3 of Novaya filosofskaya entsyklopediya: N-S.  Moscow: Mysl, 2010: 580-81.

Leontiev, Konstantin. Vizantinizm i slavyanstvo [Byzantinism and Slavism]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Sretenskogo Monastyrya, 2010.

Smirnov, Andrey. Vsechelovecheskoe vs. Obshchechelovecheskoe [The All-Human One vs The Common-Human One]. Moscow: Sadra, 2019.

Smirnov, Andrey. “Vsechelovecheskoe vs. Obshchechelovecheskoe: Yevropa, Arabskiy mir, Rossiya” [“The All-Human One vs The Common-Human One: Europe, Arabian World, Russia”]. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture, no. 4 (2019): 7-15. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-4-12-7-15.

Smirnov, Andrey. Logika smysla kak filosofiya soznaniya: priglashenie k razmyshleniyu [The Logic of Sense as a Philosophy of Mind: The Invitation to Meditation]. Moscow: Izdatelskiy Dom YaSK, 2021.

Smirnov, Andrey. Logika smysla. Teoriya i yeyo prilozhenie k analizu klassicheskoy arabskoy filosofii i kultury [The Logic of Sense. The Theory and Its Application to the Analysis of Classic Arabian Philosophy and Culture]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 2001.

Sorokin, Pitirim. Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships. London: Routledge, 1985.

Spengler, Oswald. Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 2003.

Toynbee, Arnold J. A Study of History. Vol. 1, Abridgement of Volumes I-VI. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.