This paper’s aim is to provide a new interpretation of Martha C. Nussbaum’s and Richard Rorty’s views on the ethical role of literature. I pursue this aim in a threefold manner. First of all, I shortly discuss and provide a critique of previous comparisons by other authors. Afterwards, based on the presented critique of other comparisons, I present concise summaries of their respective views. Finally, I propose a double context for interpreting and assessing their views together. The main claim of the paper is the following: despite several differences in their philosophical underpinnings, Nussbaum’s and Rorty’s views on literature can be interpreted together using the context of John Rawls and Jacques Rancière. This interpretation consists of showing how uncovering a shared Rawlsian characteristic of Nussbaum’s and Rorty’s views paves a way for explaining how literature actually does ethical work, using some concepts of Rancière. Such a contextual reading allows for both a more thorough understanding of their respective projects and assessing their shared shortcomings.
Rorty, Nussbaum, ethics, literature, novel, Rawls, Rancière
How to cite:
Bednarski, Maciej. “Moral of the Novel: Rorty and Nussbaum on the Ethical Role of Literature.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4, no. 4 (2020): 175-189. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0046.
Doctoral School of Humanities, University of Warsaw
Dobra 56/66, 00-312 Warsaw, Poland
Biondo, Francesco. “Is Martha Nussbaum really political liberal?” Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie 94, no. 3 (2008): 311-24.
Gibson, Andrew. Postmodernity, Ethics and the Novel: From Leavis to Levinas. London: Routledge, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203007181.
Głąb, Anna. Rozum w świecie praktyki. Poglądy filozoficzne Marthy C. Nussbaum. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, 2010.
Guignon, Charles, and David R. Hiley, eds. Richard Rorty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951.
Hale, Dorothy J. “Aesthetics and the New Ethics: Theorizing the Novel in the Twenty-First Century.” PMLA 124, no. 3 (2009): 896-905. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.3.896.
Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. “The Hunger of Martha Nussbaum.” Representations 77, no. 1 (2002): 52-81. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2002.77.1.52.
Johnson, Peter. Moral Philosophers and the Novel: A Study of Winch, Nussbaum and Rorty. Cham: Springer, 2004.
Leypoldt, Günter. “Uses of Metaphor: Richard Rorty’s Literary Criticism and the Poetics of World-Making.” New Literary History 39, no. 1 (2008): 145-63. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0010.
Lisowska, Urszula. Wyobraźnia, sztuka, sprawiedliwość. Marthy Nussbaum koncepcja zdolności jako podstawa egalitarnego liberalizmu. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2017.
Llanera, Tracy. “Morality by Words: Murdoch, Nussbaum, Rorty.” Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 18, no. 1 (2014): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.13185/BU2014.18101.
Malachowski, Alan. Richard Rorty. London and New York: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315710822.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Aristotelian Social Democracy.” In Liberalism and the Good. Edited by Robert Bruce Douglass, Gerald M. Mara, Henry S. Richardson. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghth8.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “The Enduring Significance of John Rawls.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 47, no. 45 (2001): Section 2, B7-9.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard University Press, 2009.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press USA, 1990.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “On Moral Progress: A Response to Richard Rorty.” University of Chicago Law Review 74, (2007): 939-60.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” The Cosmopolitan Reader (1994): 155-62.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press, 1997.
Nussbaum, Martha C. “Social Justice and Universalism: In defense of an Aristotelian Account of Human Functioning.” Modern Philology 90, (1993): S46-73. https://doi.org/10.1086/392123.
Papastephanou, Marianna. “Patriotism and Pride Beyond Richard Rorty and Martha Nussbaum.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25, no. 4 (2017): 484-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2017.1342684.
Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.
Rancière, Jacques. Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Vol. 19. Columbia University Press, 2011.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397.
Rorty, Richard. “Education as Socialization and as Individualization.” Philosophy and Social Hope (1999): 114-26.
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin UK, 1999.
Rorty, Richard. “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy.” in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers 1, (1991): 175-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643.012.
Rorty, Richard. “Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 80, no. 10 (1983): 583-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026153.
Rorty, Richard. “Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on Derrida.” New Literary History 10, no. 1 (1978): 141-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/468309.
Stow, Simon. Republic of Readers?: The Literary Turn in Political Thought and Analysis. Albany NY: SUNY Press, 2012.
Stow, Simon. “Reading our Way to Democracy? Literature and Public Ethics.” Philosophy and Literature 30, no. 2 (2006): 410-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2006.0041.
Voparil, Christopher J. Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.