Science-art collaborations are a growth area. An example is the Wellcome Collection exhibition “States of Mind”. I focus on one work yellowbluepink by Ann Veronica Janssens. As framed within the exhibition this piece is understood to present a model of spectatorship in which the art-encounter prompts an awareness of the p o s s i b i l i t y of neuroscientific self-understanding. I take it that science-art projects want to spread this celebration of “objective thought”; this is their realist agenda. The scientific framing of yellowbluepink fails in this regard because of a striking contradiction at its heart. The dominant art historical interpretation of this piece includes a spectator who is “decentred”, u n a b l e to know him or herself. This contradiction creates a methodological problem for the project, one that negatively impacts its ability to a m b i t i o u s l y promote its agenda. On the basis of this analysis I sketch out the conditions for an ambitious project. It would need to acknowledge the “artworld” and it would require the invention of a new model of spectatorship, one that promoted (self)-awareness of humankinds’ impressive epistemic capacity. This anti-phenomenological figure is formulated with reference to the nemocentric subject.
Art, Ann Veronica Janssens, Neuroscience, The Nemocentric Subject, Ray Brassier, Realism, The Decentred Spectator, Rosalind E Krauss, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology
How to cite:
Klee, Steve. “Science-Art: Neuronaturalism Beyond the Decentred Spectator.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 1, no. 2 (2017): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.26319/2917.
University of Lincoln
Bishop, Claire. Installation Art. London: Tate Publishing, 2010.
Brassier, Ray. “Against an Aesthetics of Noise. Interview by Bram Ieven for Transitzone”. Accessed July 20 2017. http://ny-web.be/transitzone/against-aesthetics-noise.html.
Brassier, Ray. “Genre is Obsolete”. The Auricle Sonic Arts Gallery. Accessed July 20, 2017. http://auricle.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Ray-Brassier-Genre-is-Obsolete.pdf.
Bryant, Levi, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman, eds. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: repress, 2011.
Cox, Christopher, Jenny Jaskey, and Suhail Malik eds. Realism Materialism Art Berlin/New York: Sternberg Press & Bard College, 2015.
Danto, Arthur C. “The Artworld.” The Journal of Philosophy 61, (1964): 571-84.
Dickie, George. “The New Institutional Theory of Art”, Proceedings of the 8th Wittgenstein Symposium 10, (1983): 57-64.
Gardner, Sebastian, and Mathew Grist eds. The Transcendental Turn, Oxford: OUP, 2015.
Howarth, David, Aletta J. Norval, and Yannis Stavrakaki, eds. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
Kitcher, Philip. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: OUP, 1993.
Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in Modern Sculpture. London: Thames & Hudson, 1977.
Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. London: Continuum, 2008.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Paul Kegan. Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk: Routledge, 1992.
Metzinger, Thomas. Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2004.
Metzinger, Thomas. “Ray Brassier in Conversation with Thomas Metzinger.” Senselogic. Accessed July 20, 2017, https://cengizerdem.wordpress.com/2015/07/20/ray-brassier-in-conversation-with-thomas-metzinger/.
Miller, Arthur. Colliding Worlds: How Cutting-edge Science is Redefining Contemporary Art. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum, 2004.
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997.
Wilson, Stephen. Art + Science Now: How Scientific Research and Technological Innovation are Becoming Key to 21st-Century Aesthetics. London: Thames & Hudson, 2010.
Wolfendale, Peter. “Rationalist Inhumanism (Dictionary Entry)”. Academia.edu. Accessed July 1, 2016. http://www.academia.edu/26697819/Rationalist_Inhumanism_Dictionary_Entry.
Wolfendale, Peter. “The Reformatting of Homo Sapiens,” video of paper delivered at the ‘05 Inhuman Symposium’. YouTube. Accessed July 20, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IpDTUhQA5U.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.