/A Reply to: Randall Auxier, “Cassirer: The Coming of a New Humanism”/
Randall Auxier delivered a paper at the Cassirer conference (published in this issue of Eidos) in which he advanced what he calls “new humanism.” To add to the discussion initiated by Auxier, in this paper I will critique (and thereby praise) posthumanism for its inability to move past the human. The gift which posthumanism gives us is clarifications on, and not radically new modes of, subjectivity. Posthumanists ask: “What happens if we retake those things which were banished by humanism and return them to theoretical considerations of ourselves as human?” My thesis is that posthumanism and new humanism are much closer than posthumanists think.
How to cite:
Besse, James W. “The New (Warm) Humanism and Posthumanism.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2, no. 3(5) (2018): 136-142. https://doi.org/10.26319/5820.
James W. Besse
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.