In this paper I revisit the debate concerning the distinction, which is sometimes made between “analytic” and “continental” philosophy. I look at the historical context in which the distinction came to prominence in the twentieth century, the reasons why it subsequently declined in popularity, and eventually had begun to be undermined. I argue that the distinction possesses intuitive content, which the recent attempts at exposing it as conceptually flawed fail to account for. I suggest that the intuitive content of the distinction provides us with resources to usefully define two different ways philosophical reflection has been approached during the course of the twentieth century. I conclude by suggesting that we can bring these two ways of approaching philosophy into focus by appealing to the idea of philosophical temperament.
analytic philosophy, continental philosophy, temperament, philosophical culture, dialogue, conflict
How to cite:
Sławkowski-Rode, Mikołaj. “The Two Cultures in Philosophy.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4, no. 4 (2020): 105-122. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0043.
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw
Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland
Ayer, A.J. Interview by Bryan Magee. Men of Ideas, BBC, 1978. Accessed October 31, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cnRJGs08hE.
Bataille, Georges. “Un-knowing and Its Consequences.” October 36, Georges Bataille: Writings on Laughter, Sacrifice, Nietzsche, Un-Knowing (Spring, 1986): 80-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/778554.
Baynes, Kenneth, James Bohman and Thomas McCarthy, eds. After Philosophy. End or Transformation? Massachusetts: MIT press, 1986.
Beaney, Michael. Analytic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198778028.001.0001.
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays On Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.” In Heidegger and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Michael Murray. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978
Carnap, Rudolf. “Öberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache.” Erkenntnis, 2 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028153.
Collingwood, R.G. An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford: OUP, 1933.
Critchley, Simon. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, New York: OUP, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192853592.001.0001.
Derrida, Jacques. “Afterword: Toward an Ethic of Discussion.” In Limited, Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
Derrida, Jacques. L’écriture et la difference. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1967.
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Glyph 1. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1977.
Dreyfus, Hubert. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
Dreyfus, Hubert. “Heidegger’s Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality.” Social Research 60, no. 1 (Spring 1993).
Dreyfus, Hubert. “Phenomenological Description Versus Rational Reconstruction.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55, no. 216 (2) (June 2001).
Dreyfus, Hubert. “The Primacy of Phenomenology over Logical Analysis.” In Skilful Coping. Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. Edited by Mark A. Wrathall. Oxford: OUP, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654703.001.0001.
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Paul Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1983. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226154534.001.0001.
Faculty of Philosophy. University of Oxford. Philosophy Lecture Year Plan for 2019-20. https://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/files/lecturescheme2019-2030augpdf.
Glendinning, Simon. The Idea of Continental Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624706.001.0001.
Heidegger, Martin. “What is Metaphysics?” Translated by David F. Krell. In Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. Edited by David F. Krell. Revised and Expanded Edition. London: Routledge, 1993.
Hoekema, David. Review of Fashionable Nihilism: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy, by Bruce Wilshire. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Accessed October 31, 2020. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/fashionable-nihilism-a-critique-of-analytic-philosophy/#note.
Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.
Leavis, Frank R. The Two Cultures? The Significance of C.P. Snow. Cambridge: CUP, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337169.
Leiter, Brian. “The Growing Mismatch Between Jobs for Philosophers and What the Leading PhD Programs Emphasize, or, the So-called ‘Core’ is Dying.” https://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2017/09/the-growing-mismatch-between-jobs-for-philosophers-and-what-the-leading-phd-programs-emphasize.html.
Leiter, Brian. “Leiter Reports.” Interview by Richard Marshall. https://316am.site123.me/articles/leiter-reports.
Leiter, Brian. “On Pluralism in Philosophy Departments, Once Again (Leiter).” https://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/on_pluralism_in.html.
Leiter, Brian. “On the Analytic – Continental Distinction.” Interview by Nigel Warburton. https://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/9/5/1/951d1fef7e166938/Brian_Leiter_on_the_Analytic_Continental_Distinction.mp3?c_id=4116421&cs_id=4116421&expiration=1581272558&hwt=5640bb196449f89cfd3e80c222ab0900.
Leiter, Brian, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy. Oxford: OUP, 2007.
Martinich, A.P. and Sosa, E. David, eds. A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998656.
Neurath, Otto. Empiricism and Sociology. Edited by Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Springer, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2525-6.
Priest, Stephen. “continental” and “analytic.” In The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Edited by Ted Honderich. Oxford: OUP, 2005.
Quine, Willard V.O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60 (1951). https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906.
Rorty, Richard. “Pragmatism and Philosophy.” In Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
Ryan, Alan, ed. Mill and Bentham, Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.
Ryle, Gilbert. “Martin Heidegger: ‘Sein Und Zeit.’” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1, no. 3 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1970.11006133.
Schroeder, William R. Continental Philosophy a Critical Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
Searle, John. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane, 1995.
Searle, John. “The Limits of Phenomenology.” In Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honour of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Edited by Mark A. Wrathall and Jeff Malpas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
Searle, John. “Neither Phenomenological Description nor Rational Reconstruction: Reply to Dreyfus.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55, No. 216 (2) (June 2001).
Searle, John. “Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida.” Glyph 2. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1977.
Snipp-Walmsley, Chris. “Postmodernism, post-structuralism, and neo-pragmatism.” In Literary Theory and Criticism, an Oxford Guide. Edited by Patricia Waugh. Oxford: OUP, 2006.
Snow, C.P. The Two Cultures. Cambridge: CUP, 2012.
Taylor, Charles. “La Philosophie analytique, Cahiers de Royaumont, Philosophie, n° IV, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit, 1962.” The Philosophical Review 73, no. 1 (1964). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183217.
Vrahimis, Andreas. “‘La Philosophie Analytique’ at Royaumont: Gilbert Ryle’s Ambivalent Phenomenology.” In Encounters Between Analytic and Continental Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290205_5.
Vrahimis, Andreas. “Questioning Metaphysics in Weimar Germany: Carnap, Heidegger, Nonsense.” In Encounters Between Analytic and Continental Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290205_3.
Vrahimis, Andreas. “‘Was There a Sun Before Men Existed?’ A.J. Ayer and French Philosophy in the Fifties.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1, no. 9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4148/jhap.v1i9.1449.
West, David. An Introduction to Continental Philosophy. Oxford: Polity, 1996.
Williams, Bernard. “Contemporary Philosophy: A Second Look.” In The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Edited by Nicholas Bunnin and E.P. Tsui-James, Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
Yoshimi, Jeffrey, Clinton Tolley, and David Woodruf Smith. “California Phenomenology.” In The Reception of Husserlian Phenomenology in North America. Edited by Michaela Beatrice Ferri. Cromwell, CT: Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99185-6_22.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.