The aim of the paper is to discuss the idea of dialogue with nature. Even though the idea of dialogue with animals, plants – even objects of inanimate nature – is well known, it has usually been treated as an expression of a naive or folk view. Yet, it has recently gained in importance as an idea that is used to describe an ecological approach to natural environment and tends to be treated as a foundation for an ecological culture. A noteworthy contribution to the reconsideration of the concept of human-nature dialogue has also been given by a number of contemporary philosophers who have offered an environmental reinterpretation of phenomenology and hermeneutics based on, among other things, Martin Buber’s concept of the I-You relationship. The paper will focus on two aspects of the concept of dialogue, namely on its epistemological and ethical implications. Following Erazim Kohák’s theory, which will be presented as a key figure of a particular manner of speaking about nature, one that leads to ecological personalism.
dialogue, ecology, hermeneutics, nature, personalism, phenomenology
How to cite:
Salwa, Mateusz. “Dialogue with Nature and the Ecological Imperative.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4, no. 4 (2020): 123-135. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0044.
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw
Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland
Abrams, David. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage Books, 2017.
Bannon, Bryan, ed. Nature and Experience: Phenomenology and the Environment. London – New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2016.
Benediktsson, Karl, and Katrín Anna Lund, eds. Conversations with Landscape. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574172.
Berry, Donald L. Mutuality: The Vision of Martin Buber. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.
Bird-David, Nurit. “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40, (February 1999): S67–S91. https://doi.org/10.1086/200061.
Blenkinsop, Sean, and Charles Scott. “Becoming Teacher/Tree and Bringing the Natural World to Students: An Educational Examination of the Influence of the Other-Than-Human World and the Great Actor on Martin Buber’s Concept of the I/Thou.” Educational Theory 67, no. 4 (2017): 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12258.
Boldonova, Irina. “Environmental Hermeneutics: Ethnic and Ecological Traditions in Aesthetic Dialogue with Nature.” Journal of Landscape Ecology 9, no. 1 (2016): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2016-0002.
Brown, Charles S., and Ted Toadvine, eds. Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2003.
Buber, Martin. I and Thou. Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith. Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark, 1959.
Cameron, W. Scott K. “Must Environmental Philosophy Relinquish the Concept of Nature? A Hermeneutic Reply to Steven Vogel.” In Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics, 102-120. Edited by Forrest Clingerman, Martin Drenthen, Brian Trenor and David Utsler. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823254255.003.0006.
Clingerman, Forrest, Martin Drenthen, Brian Trenor and David Utsler, eds. Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823254255.001.0001.
Evernden, Neil. The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
Flusser, Vilém. Natural: Mind. Translated by Rodrigo Maltez-Novaes. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing, 2013.
Friskics, Scott. “Dialogical Relations with Nature.” Environmental Ethics 23, no. 4 (2001): 391-410. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20012345.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History. Edited by Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Translated by Lawrence Schmidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer, Donald G Marshall. London–New York: Continuum 2004.
Gill, Scherto. “‘Holding Oneself Open in a Conversation’ – Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics and the Ethics of Dialogue.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 3, no. 1 (2015): 9-28.
Grün, Mauro. “Gadamer and the Otherness of Nature: Elements for an Environmental Education.” Human Studies 28, no. 2 (2005): 157-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-4190-6.
Hall, Matthew. “In Defence of Plant Personhood.” Religions 10, no. 5 (2019): 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10050317.
Hall, Matthew. Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.
Harvey, Graham. Animism. Respecting the Living World. London: C. Hurst & Co., 2017.
Holler, Linda. “Is There a Thou ‘Within’ Nature? A Dialogue with H. Richard Niebuhr.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 17, no. 1 (Spring, 1989): 81-102.
Ingold, Timothy. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-Animating Thought.” Ethnos 71, no 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111.
Kohák, Erazim. “Speaking of Persons: Mirror or Metaphor?” Personalist Forum 7, no. 2 (1991): 41-57.
Kohák, Erazim. “Speaking to trees.” Critical Review 6, no. 2-3 (1992): 371-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819208443268.
Kohák, Erazim. The Embers and the Stars. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Moral Sense of Nature. Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 1984.
Lund, Benediktsson. “Introduction: Starting a Conversation with Landscape.” In Conversations with Landscape. Edited by Karl Benediktsson, Katrín Anna Lund, 1-12. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315574172.
Manes, Christopher. “Nature and Silence.” Environmental Ethics 14, no. 4 (1992): 339-50. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19921445.
Norton, Timothy. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
O’Neil, John. “Who speaks for Nature?” In How Nature Speaks: The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition. Edited by Yrjo Haila and Chuck Dyke, 261-72. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387718-012.
Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture. The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge 2002.
Smith, Mick. “Lost for Words? Gadamer and Benjamin on the Nature of Language and the ‘Language’ of Nature.” Environmental Values 10, no. 1 (February 2001): 59-75. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327101129340741.
Salwa, Mateusz. Estetyka ogrodu. Między sztuką a ekologią. Łódź: Przypis, 2016.
Salwa, Mateusz. “Znaczenie estetyki przyrody dla etyki środowiskowej.” Etyka 56 (2008): 29-50. https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.2018.0003.
Soper, Kate. What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
Talbott, Stephen L. Ecological Conversation. Wildness, Anthropocentrism, and Deep Ecology https://netfuture.org/2002/Jan1002_127.html.
Tyburski, Włodzimierz. Dyscypliny humanistyczne i ekologia. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2013.
Vogel, Stephen. “The Silence of Nature.” In Stephen Vogel, Thinking Like a Mall: Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature, 167-97. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029100.001.0001.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.