This essay is an attempt to look at the existential phenomenon of being addicted from the perspective of speculative philosophy. The starting point is the description of Walter Benjamin’s narcotic experiences. Further in my considerations I am guided by the Kantian categories of the dialectics of pure reason, with particular emphasis on transcendental ideas. However, only the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel along with the concepts of desire and habit allows us to comprehend addiction as a wild and unbridled desire for life, taken over by a dead scheme, by a mechanism, automatism. It is in this behavior, and only in it, that we constantly become aware of ourselves, lose ourselves to the specified objectification, obtain finite satisfaction, and repeat that deadness – this what addiction precisely is according to the Phenomenology of Spirit and the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Hegel links it with an attitude of “stubborn subjectivity” that clings to the limits of its solipsistic finiteness, to the “bad infinity” and seeks satisfaction within its borders. In this way, the German philosopher links addictive behavior with the structure of dialectics itself.
addiction, dialectic, speculative philosophy, finitude, bad infinity, happiness, Benjamin, Kant, Hegel
How to cite:
Sosnowski, Maciej A. “Infinity Now! Speculative Philosophy and Addiction.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 6, no. 1 (2022): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0003.
Maciej A. Sosnowski
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
72 Nowy Świat Street, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland
Benjamin, Walter. On Hashish. Translated by Howard Eiland. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Hegel, Georg W. F. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Translated by William Wallace. Blackmask Online, 2001.
Hegel, Georg W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Arnold V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.
Hegel, Georg W. F. Science of Logic. Translated by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1996.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgement. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Mathews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Translated by Paul Carus. Revised by James W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2001.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2002.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Jonathan Bennet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Malabou, Catherine. Future of Hegel. Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. Translated by Lisabeth During. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.