Abstract:
Michael Esfeld has recently put forth his ontology of persons, with which he hopes to secure freedom and irreducible personhood as well as scientific realism, all by working with minimal ontological assumptions. I present his view and investigate it, finding it too minimalistic: Esfeld’s featureless matter points do not warrant an emergence of persons from matter, and his claim that persons can create themselves by adopting a normative attitude seems more like a just-so story. Also, Esfeld’s rejection of classical mind-body dualism seems premature. I present as an alternative a modified mind-body dualism which solves the problems of Esfeld’s view and argue that embedding it in a theistic worldview is favorable for any account that seeks to establish irreducible personhood.
Keywords:
persons, naturalism, Super-Humeanism, causal closure, dualism, minimalist ontology
How to cite:
Cucu, Alin Christoph. “More Substance, Please: A Reply To Michael Esfeld’s Minimalist Ontology of Persons.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 7, no. 3 (2023): 48-66. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2023.0023.
Author:
Alin Christoph Cucu
University of Lausanne
Quartier Centre, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9127-9662
alin.cucu@unil.ch
References:
Barnes, Jonathan. The Presocratics. Boston MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.
Bird, Alexander. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Cartwright, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247044.001.0001.
Chen, Eddy Keming, and Sheldon Goldstein. “Governing without a Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature.” In Rethinking the Concept of Law of Nature, edited by Yemima Ben-Menahem, 21-64. Cham: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8_2.
Cucu, Alin C. “Interacting Minds in the Physical World.” PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, 2022.
Cucu, Alin C., and J. Brian Pitts. “How Dualists Should (Not) Respond to the Objection from Energy Conservation.” Mind and Matter 17, no. 1 (2019): 95-121.
Esfeld, Michael. Science and Human Freedom. Cham: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37771-7.
Esfeld, Michael. “Super-Humeanism and Mental Causation.” In Powers, Time and Free Will, 257–72. Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92486-7_13.
Esfeld, Michael. “Why Determinism in Physics Has No Implications for Free Will.” Organon F 26, no. 1 (2019): 62-85. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2019.26105.
Goetz, Stewart, and Charles Taliaferro. A Brief History of the Soul. 1st ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395938.
Harré, Rom, and Edward H. Madden. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Blackwell, 1975.
Hasker, William. The Emergent Self. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary Rosenkrantz. “Are Souls Unintelligible?” Philosophical Perspectives 5, (1991): 183-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214095.
Huemer, M. Ethical Intuitionism. 2005 edition. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-50317-5.
Ismael, Jenann. How Physics Makes Us Free. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190269449.001.0001.
Jackson, Frank. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Kajamies, Timo. “De Novo Creat : Descartes on Action, Interaction, and Continuous Creation.” In The World as Active Power: Studies in the History of European Reason, edited by Juhani Pietarinen and Valtteri Viljanen, 163–184. Leiden NL: Brill, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004177123.i-352.52.
Kim, Jaegwon. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001.
Koperski, Jeffrey. “Breaking Laws of Nature.” Philosophia Christi 19, no. 1 (2017): 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20171916.
Koperski, Jeffrey. Divine Action, Determinism and the Laws of Nature. Taylor & Francis, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029110.
Lazarovici, Dustin. “Super-Humeanism: A Starving Ontology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64, (2018): 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.07.001.
Lycan, William G. “Redressing Substance Dualism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose and Angus J.L. Menuge, 22–40. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468004.ch2.
Maudlin, Tim. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001.
Moreland, J.P. “In Defense of a Thomistic-like Dualism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose and Angus J.L. Menuge, 102-22. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468004.ch7.
Moreland, J.P. “Substance Dualism and the Unity of Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose and Angus J.L. Menuge, 184-207. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468004.ch12.
Moreland, James P., and Scott B. Rae. Body & Soul – Human Nature & the Crisis in Ethics. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2000.
Oderberg, David S. “Restoring the Hierarchy of Being.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by William M.R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons, and James Orr, 94-124. United Kingdom: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125860-5.
Pitts, J. Brian. “Conservation Laws and the Philosophy of Mind: Opening the Black Box, Finding a Mirror.” Philosophia 48, 2019, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00102-7.
Rickabaugh, Brandon. “Against Emergent Dualism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose and Angus J.L. Menuge, 73-86. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468004.ch5.
Robb, David, and John Heil. “Mental Causation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2019. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/mental-causation/.
Shapiro, Lisa, ed. The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226204444.001.0001.
Swinburne, Richard. Mind, Brain, and Free Will. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662562.001.0001.
Von Wachter, Daniel. Die Kausale Struktur Der Welt: Eine Philosophische Untersuchung Über Verursachung, Naturgesetze, Freie Handlungen, Möglichkeit Und Gottes Kausale Rolle in Der Welt. Berlin: Verlag, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783495998618.
Von Wachter Daniel. “Miracles are not Violations of the Laws of Nature Because the Laws do not Entail Regularities.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 37-60. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.86.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.