This essay argues for a concept of political identity that is fundamentally relational in nature contra more liberal accounts of identity that are atomistic. I consider John Rawls’ account of political identity in his Political Liberalism and provide a response stemming from Hannah Arendt’s account of political identity grounded in the existential condition of politics: human plurality. Using her concept of human plurality, I argue that political identity ought to be conceived as relationally individuated as opposed to atomistically so, meaning that our identities only emerge in and through appearing before other political actors and not prior to it. The larger upshot is that conceiving of political identity as relational provides a more fruitful concept of the citizen and might allow progress to be made regarding some of the more entrenched political problems in American political culture, especially polarization and partisanship.
identity, liberalism, plurality, Hannah Arendt, political
How to cite:
Antonini, David. “Relational Plurality as a Corrective to Liberal Atomistic Pluralism.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 4, no. 3 (2020): 65-75. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0031.
Department of Philosophy and Religion, Clemson University
126D Hardin Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Arendt, Hannah. “The Crisis in Culture.” In Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
Arendt, Hannah. “What is Freedom?” In Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.
Canovan, Margaret. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Held, Virginia. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Mouffe, Chantal. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66, no.3 (1999): 745-58.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Just. Translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Villa, Dana. “Modernity, Alienation, and Critique.” In Hannah Arendt and the Meaning of Politics, edited by Craig Calhoun and John McGowan. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Zerilli, Linda. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226398037.001.0001.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.