This paper attempts to illustrate a process of analysis that will hopefully open a path to more complete and useful definitions of sign and symbol. It applies a form-content analysis to the metaphysical properties of these two concepts. The objective is to locate criteria necessary and sufficient to derive formal definitions for these terms. Wittgenstein’s concept of “forms of representation” is analyzed and applied to the topic. Criteria are outlined that determine the appropriateness of the sign and symbol to be applied as labels. Criteria of definition are then developed using gesture, metaphor, and several other example types to illustrate the use of the criteria in distinguishing between sign and symbol. The structural organization of these two concepts proved to be especially complex and led to what some readers may find somewhat obscure. It is not our intention to be purposefully obscure.
sign, symbol, form, content, class, concept
How to cite:
Herrman, Charles. “The Criteria Necessary to Achieve Formal Definitions of Sign and Symbol.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 6, no. 1 (2022): 97-121. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0008.
Barthes, Roland. Elements of Semiology. Translated by Annette Lavers and Colin Smith. New York: Hill and Wang, 1967.
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 1. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955.
Cohen, Morris R. Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1931.
Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1976.
Eliade, Mircea. Rites and Symbols of Initiation: The Mysteries of Birth and Rebirth. Translated by Willard R. Trask. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1958.
Encyclopedia.com, “Panentheism.” https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/pantheism-and-panentheism.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1984.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.
Hjelmslev, Louis. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Translated by Francis J. Whitfield. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.
Hendel, Charles W. “Introduction.” In The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Translated by Ralph Manheim, 1-65. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1955.
Herrman, Charles. “Secundum De Officiis’ Part I Metaphysics.” Posted January 7, 2009. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1323354. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1323354.
Herrman, Charles. “What Is Dignity?” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3, no. 9 (2019): 103-126. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0033.
de Joia, Alex and Adrian Stenton. Systemic Linguistics: A Guide to Halliday. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980.
Kramer, Eli. Intercultural Modes of Philosophy. Vol. 1, Principles to Guide Philosophical Community. Boston: Brill, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468986.
Langer, Susanne K. Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1953.
Langer, Susanne K. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite and Art. Third edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Lindberg, Christine A., ed. The Oxford American Writer’s Thesaurus. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Pei, Mario and Frank Gaynor. Dictionary of Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library, 1954.
Peirce, Charles. The Collected Papers, 6 vols. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931-35.
Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine. Vol. 1, The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). Chicago: University of Chicago, 1971. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226028163.001.0001.
Pettit, Philip. The Concept of Structuralism: A Critical Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1975.
Piaget, Jean. Structuralism. Translated by Chaninah Maschler. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970.
Russell, Bertrand. “Introduction.” In Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philsophicus. Translated by Charles K. Ogden. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Gramercy Books, 1956.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Edited by John Kulka. Translated by Carol Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15vwkgx.
de Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1983.
Smith, Kate. “Color Symbolism and Meaning of Black.” https://www.sensationalcolor.com/meaning-of-black/.
Stewart, Frank Henderson. Honor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Weiss, Paul. “Being, Essence and Existence.” The Review of Metaphysics 1, no. 1 (September 1947): 69-92.
Wiktionary.org. “s. v. Primitive English Etymology.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/primitive#Etymology.
Open Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Submitting a text to Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture means that the author agrees with the general conditions of this license. The author does and will maintain copyrights and publishing rights for his/her article without any restrictions.